A question in XAT 2012 Question Paper with Answers has been updated:
The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the litreacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the litreacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of litreacy rate.
Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?
- The rate of fall in litreacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in litreacy rate between 2001 and 2006.
- The rise in litreacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.
- Many of those who were illitreate in 2001 become litreate by 2006.
- Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the litreacy rate is reliable.
- One of the causes of more litreacy is the increased population growth rate.
No comments:
Post a Comment